Paid advertising with AutoHive: Google's Performance Max and AI Max, Meta's Advantage+ and Microsoft Advertising now let platform AI decide most targeting and bidding, and reward advertisers who supply strong creative volume and clean conversion signals rather than micromanaged bids. Because a slow website raises the cost of every ad through Quality Score, landing-page experience and conversion decay, AutoHive fixes the website first or declines the advertising spend. Pricing is transparent: a once-off setup fee of R12 500 for Google and Meta account architecture, a management fee of 20% of advertising spend, weekly advert reporting, and a monthly deep analysis with named changes.
Paid advertising, current
The platforms' AI took over targeting. Feed it well, or pay for feeding it badly.
Most advice about Google and Meta ads is three algorithm updates out of date. The bidding levers agencies used to bill hours for have largely been taken away; what the machines reward now is good creative in volume and honest conversion data, and they quietly tax everything else, starting with slow websites. This page explains how the three big ad systems actually read your ads today, and ends with exactly what our management costs.
The current machinery
How the three big platforms read ads now.
Each platform has moved the same direction: away from advertisers hand-picking audiences and bids, toward AI systems that decide both, guided by what you feed them. The job of an advertiser has changed from operating the machine to supplying it. Here is where each system stands.
Google: Performance Max & AI Max
Performance Max takes your goals, budget and a pool of assets: headlines, images, video. Google's AI then assembles and places ads across Search, Maps, YouTube, Gmail and the display network. AI Max extends the same logic into search campaigns, loosening keyword matching so Google chases the meaning of a query rather than the exact phrase. The old craft of exhaustive keyword lists is dissolving; what remains decisive is the quality of your assets and the honesty of the conversion data you report back.
See where the conversion data livesMeta: Advantage+, where creative is the targeting
On Facebook and Instagram, Advantage+ broad targeting now routinely beats the hand-stacked interest audiences agencies once sold as expertise. Meta's system watches who responds to each piece of creative and finds more people like them, which means the ad itself does the audience selection. A video that speaks precisely to workshop owners finds workshop owners. Creative volume and variety are the levers now; the audience spreadsheet is nostalgia.
See what creative works whereMicrosoft: LinkedIn data & Copilot surfaces
Microsoft Advertising is the quiet third player worth taking seriously for B2B: it can target search ads by LinkedIn profile dimensions: industry, company, job function. Neither Google nor Meta offers that. And as Microsoft builds ads into Copilot, its AI assistant, advertising is beginning to appear inside AI conversations, not just beside search results. Smaller audience in South Africa, but often cheaper clicks and a professional skew that suits invoice-signing buyers.
Map the platforms for your buyersThe common thread: the algorithms reward creative volume and clean conversion signals, not micromanaged bids. "Clean conversion signals" means the platform learns from real business outcomes: a lead that became a sale, logged properly, rather than vanity events like page views. That is one reason our client-owned CRM is not just a transparency tool: the same verified lead data you audit is the data that trains the platforms to find you better customers. Honesty, it turns out, is also an optimisation strategy.
The site-speed gate
A slow website makes every ad expensive. So we fix the site first, or decline the spend.
This is the part of our process that costs us business, which is why you should trust it. Before we take a rand of advertising budget, we test the website the ads will point at. If it is slow or the conversion path is broken, we tell you to fix that first, usually with our web development division or your own developer, and we decline to launch until it is done. Here is the reasoning, lever by lever.
Quality Score and landing-page experience. Google scores every ad partly on the experience of the page it leads to: relevance, usability, and load speed. A poor landing-page experience drags the score down, and a lower score means you pay more per click for the same position than a competitor with a better page. The tax is invisible, automatic, and charged on every single click.
Conversion decay. Speed research, Google's own engineering publications among the most cited, has shown consistently that as load time stretches, abandonment climbs sharply; on mobile, where most South African traffic lives, even a few extra seconds sends a large share of visitors back before the page ever renders. There is also a cognitive layer: Daniel Kahneman's work on cognitive ease describes how effortless experiences breed trust while effortful ones breed suspicion. A stuttering page does not merely delay a visitor; it makes your business feel unreliable at the exact moment they arrived ready to believe you.
The multiplication. Put the two together and a slow site loses twice: you pay more for each click, and you convert fewer of the clicks you paid for. Every campaign, every month, on the platform's meter. Running good ads to a bad website is pouring water into a cracked tank and blaming the rain, and an agency paid on ad spend has every incentive not to mention the crack. We mention it, in writing, before we start; the same audit also checks what strangers find when they Google you, because ads send people to your reputation as surely as to your site.
What managed advertising costs
The pricing mechanics, with no small print.
You should not need a meeting to learn what something costs. The full package structure lives on the pricing page; these are the mechanics that apply to all paid advertising we manage.
Once-off setup: R12 500
Google and Meta account architecture done properly, once: campaign structure, pixels and Conversions API (the server-side tracking that keeps conversion data flowing as browsers restrict cookies), conversion definitions that reflect real business outcomes, and a baseline audit, including the site-speed gate above. Set up in your accounts, which you own from day one; the digital assets page puts that promise in writing.
See the ownership standardManagement: 20% of ad spend
Our monthly fee is 20% of what you spend on advertising. The alignment is deliberate: we earn more only when spending more, and we can only recommend spending more when the weekly reports prove it is working, in a CRM you can open and check. An incentive you can audit is worth ten you must take on faith.
See the full package structureWeekly advert reporting
Every week, in plain language: what ran, what it cost, what it returned. Not a quarterly deck: a standing weekly account of your money, with every reported lead traceable to its source in your own CRM. If a week was poor, the report says so and says why. You will never learn more from an agency than in the week it admits something failed.
See how you verify itMonthly deep analysis
Once a month, the strategist's document: what the numbers mean, what is compounding, what is decaying, and a named list of exactly what we will change next month and why. Named changes are a commitment device: next month's report has to answer to this month's list. That loop, repeated, is the whole agentic method.
Read the agentic methodAnd the honest qualifier that belongs on any advertising page: paid ads amplify what exists; they do not create it. If your offer is weak, your ads will announce that efficiently and at scale. Advertising works best on top of a fast site, a managed reputation, and content worth arriving at. This site is one argument in eleven chapters for building all of it in the right order: the buzz, so to speak, is earned before it is bought.
What the machine needs from you
Our side is the system. Your side is three habits.
Managed advertising is not a drop-off service, and pretending otherwise is how campaigns quietly fail. Because the platforms now optimise on creative and conversion truth, the client's side of the work has changed too. It is lighter than the old way, but it is real. First: raw material. Photographs of actual jobs, a phone video of the owner explaining something, the sentence a happy customer said: authentic material consistently outperforms stock polish, and only you can produce it. We shape it; you supply the truth it is shaped from.
Second: sales feedback. Tell the CRM which leads became customers. That single habit, a status change your team makes anyway, is what turns the platforms' AI from finding clickers to finding buyers, and it is why campaigns wired into the transparent CRM improve in a way screenshot-reported campaigns cannot.
Third: patience with the process, impatience with the reporting. Give the learning phases their weeks. But never accept a missing or vague weekly report, from us or anyone. The discipline you should enforce on your agency is not "make every week a winner"; it is "account for every week, plainly". We built the whole system so that you can.
Straight answers
The questions invoice-signers ask before spending.
What monthly budget do we need before this makes sense?
Enough for the platform's AI to learn from: the systems need a steady flow of conversions to optimise against, and a budget too thin to produce them just buys expensive silence. The honest floor differs by industry and by what a customer is worth to you, so we work it out from your numbers in the pre-spend audit rather than quoting a universal figure that would be fiction for half the readers of this page. Sometimes our advice is to start smaller on one platform and prove the loop before scaling; occasionally it is to wait entirely.
How long before we see results?
Expect a learning period measured in weeks, not days: the platforms explicitly run new campaigns through a learning phase while their systems work out who responds. Judging a campaign in its first week is like judging a hire on their first morning. What you should see immediately is process: the weekly report from week one, showing what ran, what it cost and what it returned, so the learning period is documented rather than hidden behind "trust us, it's warming up".
Do you guarantee results?
No, and we would ask you to be suspicious of anyone who does, because they control neither the auction, the algorithm, nor your competitors. What we guarantee is conduct: honest setup in accounts you own, weekly reporting you can verify in your own CRM, a monthly analysis with named changes, and a plain recommendation to stop or redirect spend if the numbers say so, even though our fee shrinks when your spend does.
Whose name is on the ad accounts?
Yours. Google and Meta accounts are created under your business's ownership with billing in your name; we operate through manager access you grant and can revoke. If we part ways, your account history, your pixel data and your audiences stay exactly where they always were: with you. The digital assets page makes this a written standard, not a courtesy.
Why 20% of spend rather than a flat fee?
Because a flat fee pays the same for neglect as for excellence, and a pure percentage with hidden reporting rewards reckless spending. The combination we run, a percentage plus weekly reporting you can audit, keeps the incentive honest from both directions: we grow only by finding spend that demonstrably works, and you can check the demonstration yourself. It also scales sanely: small budgets are not crushed by a big flat retainer.
Can you just run the ads and skip the website work?
If the site passes the speed gate, gladly: the gate is a test, not a sales funnel, and plenty of sites pass. If it fails, we decline the spend until it is fixed, by our web division or anyone competent you prefer. Taking management fees to pour traffic into a page that leaks it would be profitable for us and poor stewardship of you, and stewardship is the product.
We already have an agency running our ads. Can you audit their work?
Yes, and we will be fair about it: the pre-spend audit reads the account structure, the tracking honesty and the landing-page experience, and reports what it finds whether that flatters us or them. Good agencies exist, and if yours is one we will say so; an audit that always concludes "hire us" is not an audit, it is an advert wearing a lab coat.
Who makes the ad creative, you or us?
We do the shaping, which means copy, editing, formats and variants at the volume the algorithms reward, from raw truth you help supply: real photographs, the owner on camera, the words actual customers use. Polished stock imagery is the camouflage pattern of forgettable advertising; audiences scroll past it on reflex, and the youngest audiences distrust it on sight. The production cadence, and which formats earn video budget versus a strong static, is covered on the social and video page.
When would you tell us to stop or pause advertising?
When the numbers say so: conversion costs rising past what your margins support, a seasonal trough where spend buys attention nobody acts on, a website change that breaks the conversion path, or an offer the market has plainly declined. The monthly analysis names it, the recommendation goes in writing, and our fee shrinks with the spend, which is exactly why the recommendation is believable. An agency that can never say "stop" is a vending machine, not an advisor.
Is the R12 500 setup fee negotiable if our accounts already exist?
The fee covers the work, not the ceremony: existing accounts still get the full audit, conversion rebuild, tracking verification and architecture correction, and in our experience inherited accounts often need more repair than fresh ones. Where genuinely little work is needed, the audit will say so, and the audit happens before you commit. What we do not do is discount the foundation to win the retainer; that trade is how badly-tracked accounts are born.
Which platform should we start with?
The one where your customers already look for what you sell, which is a research question, not a preference. Search-driven businesses usually start with Google; visually-driven and impulse categories often start with Meta; B2B with a defined professional buyer should at least test Microsoft's LinkedIn-profile targeting. The social and video page maps who is actually on each platform in South Africa, including the platforms we will tell you to ignore.
One clear next step
Start with the pre-spend audit.
Before any budget moves, we audit your website speed, your conversion path and your account setup, and tell you plainly whether you are ready to advertise profitably, or what to fix first and roughly what that costs. If the answer is "not yet", you will hear it from us before you have spent anything. That refusal is the cheapest insurance in marketing.
Request the pre-spend auditOr read the full package pricing. Every number is public.